aggrieved person cannot be left without remedy

In Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Share Holders Welfare Association Vs. S.C. Sekar and Ors. (2009) 2 SCC 784 it is ruled that in contempt cases even if no appeal lies then also the aggrieved person cannot be left without remedy. Access to justice is a human right. In certain situations it may also be considered to be a fundamental right. It is ruled as under; 86

“51. We will, however, proceed on the assumption that no appeal was maintainable. An aggrieved person cannot be left without a remedy. Access to justice is a human right. In certain situations it may also be considered to be a fundamental right. (See Tashi Delek Gaming Solutions Ltd. v. State of Karnataka AIR2006SC661 and Arunima Baruah v. Union of India (2007) 6 SCC 120.) 52. Concededly this Court has the jurisdiction to entertain a special leave petition. When the entire matter is before us this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 136 read with Article 142 of the Constitution of India may pass such orders which would do complete justice to the parties. [See - T. Vijendradas v. M. Subramanian AIR 2008 SC 563].