Articles in this category Licence to shop should not be renewed if lease expired Raihanath vs State Of Kerala on 27 April, 2023 occupation without consent is wrongful occupation C. Albert Morris vs K. Chandrasekaran & Ors on 26 October, 2005Author: . A LakshmananBench: Dr. Ar. Lakshmanan, Altamas Kabir CASE NO.:Appeal (civi mere continuance in occupation of the demised premises after the expiry of the lease, notwithstanding the receipt of an amount by the quondam landlord would not create a tenancy so as to confer on the erstwhile tenant the status of tenant or a right to be Much argument was advanced on the receipt of the rent by the landlord after the cancellation of the lease. The consensus of judicial opinion in this country is that a mere con to bring a new tenancy into existence within the meaning of Section 116, there should be an agreement as the section contemplates that on one side, there should be an offer of taking a fresh demise evidenced by the lessee's continuing occupation of the pr C. Albert Morris vs K. Chandrasekaran & Ors on 26 October, 2005Author: . A LakshmananBench: Dr. Ar. Lakshmanan, Altamas Kabir CASE NO.:Appeal (civi continued occupation of something which he had no right to occupy cannot be regarded as source of a right to the land of which he himself was not in lawful possession C. Albert Morris vs K. Chandrasekaran & Ors on 26 October, 2005Author: . A LakshmananBench: Dr. Ar. Lakshmanan, Altamas Kabir CASE NO.:Appeal (civi