ouster in the case of co-owner

Anti Corruption Team ACT help desk Knowledgebase Law and Legal Remedies - Litigation Process Civil Cases Building - House - Land -Property- Real Estate-Security

n B.R. Patil Vs. Tulsa Y. Sawarkar and others [2022 Live Law (SC) 165], wherein dealing with the aspect of ouster, it is held that three elements are necessary for establishing the plea of ouster in the case of co-owner (i) declaration of hostile animus, (ii) long and uninterrupted possession of the person pleading ouster, and (iii) exercise of right of exclusive ownership openly and to the knowledge of other co-owner.

Article Details

Article ID:

763

Category:

Building - House - Land -Property- Real Estate-Security

Date added:

2022-12-25 07:04:30

Rating :

Go back

Alternative - Inconsistent
Person claiming adverse possession must show not only his possession but that mutation entries are mad in accordance with land record and he must further show that the owner had knowledge of that
after repossesion, liability of tax cannot be put on previous owner
Exclusive possession of suit premises was not parted with by owner
“principal employer” means,—

Suggested knowledgebase articles:

ouster in the case of co-owner

Article Details

Related articles