possibility of tampering with evidence or influencing witness

REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.3816 OF 2024
@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 11023 OF 2024
ARVIND KEJRIWAL   APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION          RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.3817 OF 2024
@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 10991 OF 2024
J U D G M E N T
UJJAL BHUYAN, J.
26. That apart, the apprehension of tampering with the
evidence or influencing witnesses has already been answered by
this Court in the case of Manish Sisodia in the following manner:
57.    Insofar   as   the   apprehension   given   by   the
learned ASG regarding the possibility of tampering
the evidence is concerned, it is to be noted that the
case   largely   depends   on   documentary   evidence
which   is   already   seized   by   the   prosecution.   As
such, there is no possibility of tampering with the
evidence.   Insofar   as   the   concern   with   regard   to
influencing the  witnesses is concerned, the said
concern can be addressed by imposing stringent
conditions upon the appellant.