undermine respect for law laid down by the High Court and impair the constitutional authority

That, in Barad Kanta Mishra vs. State of Orissa (1973) 1 SCC 446, it is ruled as under; ‘‘15. The conduct of the appellant in not following the previous, decision of the High Court is calculated to create confusion in the administration of law. It will undermine respect for law laid down by the High Court and impair the constitutional authority of the High Court. His conduct is therefore comprehended by the principles underlying the law of Contempt. The analogy of the inferior court's 96 disobedience to the specific order of a superior court also suggests that his conduct falls within the purview of the law of Contempt Just as the disobedience to a specific order of the Court underminesthe authority and dignity of the court in a particular case, similarly the deliberate and malafide conduct of not following the law laid down in the previous decision undermines the constitutional authority and respect of the High Court. Indeed, while the former conduct has repercussions on an individual case and on a limited number of persons, the latter conduct has a much wider and more disastrous impact. It is calculated not only to undermine the constitutional authority and respect of the High Court, generally, but is also likely to subvert the Rule of Law 'and engender harassing uncertainty and confusion in the administration of law.’’