member of the Service has engaged himself in activities prejudicial to the interests of the security of the State

10(1A) If the Government of a State or the Central Government, as the case may be, is of the opinion that a member of the Service has engaged himself in activities prejudicial to the interests of the security of the State, that Government may— (a) if the member of the Service is serving under that Government, pass an order placing him under suspension, or (b) if the member of the Service is serving under another Government, request that Government to place him under suspension, till the passing of the final order in the case: 5 Inserted vide Notification No. 11018/1/2013-AIS-III, dt. 21.12.2015 (GSR No. 1001(E) dt. 23.12.2015) 6 Substituted vide Notification No. 11018/3/97-AIS-III, dt. 13.7.1998 (GSR No. 130 dt. 25.7.1998) and again substituted vide Notification No.11018/3/2004-AIS-III dt.30.09.2009 (GSR No.714(E) dt. 30.09.2009) 7 Substituted vide Notification No.11018/3/2004-AIS-III dt.30.09.2009 (GSR No.714(E) dt. 30.09.2009) 8 Substituted vide Notification No. 11018/1/2013-AIS-III, dt. 21.12.2015 (GSR No. 1001(E) dt. 23.12.2015) 9 Substituted vide Notification No. 11018/1/2013-AIS-III, dt. 21.12.2015 (GSR No. 1001(E) dt. 23.12.2015) 10 Deleted/inserted/substituted vide DP&AR Notification No. 6/9/72-AIS-III, dt. 5.7.1975 (GSR No. 872,dt. 19.7.1975) 265 Provided that, in cases, where there is a difference of opinion— (i) between two State Governments, the matter shall be referred to the Central Government for its decision; (ii) between a State Government and the Central Government, the opinion of the Central Government shall prevail.