Articles in this category Suspicion need to be supported by evidence IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.108 OF 2012 GUNA MAHTO ...APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SANJAY KAROL, J. 7. It is a set... Lingering Doubt Theory THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SUNDAR @ SUNDARRAJAN — Appellant VS STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE — Respondent ( Before : Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI., Hima Kohli and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, JJ.... When two points of view are possible, consider in favor of adopting the innocence of the accused. circumstantial evidence. When two points of view are possible, consider in favor of adopting the innocence of the accused. Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, Criminal Appeal No. 1304 of 201...