husband has a moral and legal obligation to support his wife who is unable to support herself,

1.      According to the Punjab    and Haryana High Court, even if  the    husband is  a beggar  , it is his moral and legal obligation  to provide for his wife who is  raising herself  .  is unable.

2.       The claim was    made by High Court Justice H S Madan in  a case in  which the husband was found pending  divorce proceedings by  the Additional  Sessions Judge of   Charkhi Dadri.   He    had  challenged the order  to give Rs 5,000  as monthly assistance  to his wife   .

3.        During the hearing,  the  division bench  of Justice Madan was also informed  that the  Additional Sessions Judge had imposed an objectionable judgment of February 14  to the wife as  litigation  fee.  The court had    also ordered  a  lump sum payment   of Rs 5,500  as well as Rs 500 for  every hearing  .

4.      Looking at   the respondent-argument, Judge Madan held  that the respondent-husband was competent and nowadays,  even a physical labourer can  earn Rs 500  or more per day.    Given the rising price trend and the  fact  that essential necessities are   becoming increasingly expensive,  the lower court's maintenance  decision is excessive.  Cannot be  considered.

5.     "Of course, a husband   has   a  moral and legal obligation to  support his wife who is  unable to  support herself, even if  she is a professional beggar. The respondent/husband      was  unable to prove on  record that the wife had a source of income or sufficient wealth.    It was deemed appropriate  to allow an application under Section 24   of the  Marriage  Act and, inter alia, provided  litigation fees," said Judge Madan.

6.      In his judgment, Judge Madan  said that the  convulsioned order of the trial court was    completely and justified.

7.     Justice Madan  dismissed the revision petition,  saying, "The revision capacity of this court is relatively restricted, and given the facts  and circumstances of  the case,  disputed."  There is no ground  to interfere in the decision. "